WHAT IS BEST FOR HOLMDEL IS BEST FOR LUCENT SITE

Holmdel Republican Chairman Tom Scarano is again engaging in a campaign of misinformation (“High-density housing not solution in Holmdel” 8/27/08 letter to editor in the Independent). From the start, Democratic Committee members Fink and Berk, along with candidates Mike Sockol and Rich Mausner opposed changing zoning that would accommodate anything other than commercial development on the Lucent site. Behind the scenes, Mayor DiMaso and Committeemen Pascucci and Bateman supported housing, and, for the record, Mr. Pascucci spoke in favor of housing at a developer-sponsored meeting and voted against a resolution maintaining commercial only zoning on the Lucent site. Mr. Scarano himself penned a letter last year supporting residential housing on Lucent.

Holmdel’s Democratic leadership does not blindly support preserving the old Bell Labs building. It seeks instead public dialogue and independent study to consider different uses for the property, as suggested by the Lucent Citizens’ Advisory Committee. Committeeman Pascucci and his allies would rather see a new study by the same town planner who supported PREI’s mixed-use proposal last year to put hundreds of houses on the Lucent site. What also needs analysis is what the impact of tearing down Bell Labs will have on Holmdel’s affordable housing obligations.

Long time Holmdel residents know it was a Republican administration that brought a flood of high density housing into northern Holmdel and a Democratic administration who developed a COAH Round III plan that had ZERO new units being constructed via the recycling of older units. Who should you trust with the disposition of the Lucent site: the thoughtful approach suggested by Democratic leadership led by Larry Fink or Republicans with a legacy of being soft on development and short on vision? For more details go to www.holmdeldemocraticalliance.org

Tony Orsini
Holmdel Democratic Party Chairman

2 Comments

Filed under COAH, Holmdel Democratic Alliance, Holmdel Democrats, Mike Sockol, Rich Mausner, Tony Orsini

2 responses to “WHAT IS BEST FOR HOLMDEL IS BEST FOR LUCENT SITE

  1. Joseph Ferrara. Sellsius

    The Bell Labs building should be preserved (at least in part). It is a part of Holmdel and tech history, as well as architectural history, having been designed by Eero Saarinen.

    http://tinyurl.com/pm2wo

    The past re-developer realized that using this history might enhance the value of the project.

    http://tinyurl.com/3rpt8l

  2. Joseph Ferrara. Sellsius

    The Bell Labs building should be preserved (at least in part). It is a part of Holmdel and tech history, as well as architectural history, having been designed by Eero Saarinen.http://tinyurl.com/pm2woThe past re-developer realized that using this history might enhance the value of the project.http://tinyurl.com/3rpt8l

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s