>Middletown Update and Background Proposed Four Ponds Development Plan

>At the behest of the Township Committee, Township Administrator Tony Mercantante, posted the following letter the Middletown Township website late yesterday, the letter is an attempt to give some background information behind the history of the rezoning of the Avaya property in Lincroft that is a hot-button issue in town and ready to explode. At least three separate citizens groups are now involved and on record as being opposed to the project.

What this letter doesn’t tell residents about is how, much like the infamous “Town Center” project, the Township went to Torsevias (the owners of the property) and pitched this idea to them. The township would never have been able to rezone this property if the owners weren’t on board with it. Promises were made and palms were greased in some way to make this happen, now the Township needs to backpedal before it’s too late.

Unfortunately it may be too late for that already, money has been spent already on the project by the owners, they would want so type of reimbursement for there troubles i’m sure, which will tie this project up in the courts for years at a cost of millions of dollars to the tax payers of Middletown if it doesn’t go through.

And as usual, the Township is blaming Democrats in Trenton for inaction on the issue of COAH. They wont dare point a finger at the Governor for vetoing the COAH bill that was past by the assembly last year. If COAH was on the top of the Governor’s priority list, he would be taking the lead on this issue like he has been while bashing teachers and unions.

But don’t confuse the issues of COAH and this project, the opposition to this redevelopment is not COAH based as the Township wants you to believe. The opposition is opposed to the project based on quality of life issues and concerns such as infrastructure, traffic and the effects of having many more students enroll in area schools.

Dear Residents:

The Township Committee has asked that I provide a summary of the circumstances surrounding the proposed Four Ponds Development Plan at the former Avaya property, which is part of the Township’s state-mandated Council On Affordable Housing (“COAH”) housing plan.

The Township Committee has many concerns about this proposed project, which is why the Township is currently litigating the COAH’s revised third round rules before the New Jersey Supreme Court. Not only has the Township joined in the League of Municipality’s lawsuit, but the Township also filed its own lawsuit, which was just recently accepted by the Supreme Court. It is unclear, however, when this case will be heard, which could be anywhere from 6 months to a year, or more, from now. In the meantime, the Township is still subject to COAH’s rules, as they existed three years ago.

It is the Township’s belief that we should not be punished by these rules since, we believe there are plenty of affordable housing units, including rental units available throughout the Township. This fact is largely the basis of our legal position. Further, the Township does not have a history of exclusionary zoning that would be in violation of the original Mount Laurel doctrine. Unfortunately, this legal doctrine has evolved into something it was never intended to be, which essentially hands control of much of our zoning over to developers and in some cases the courts.

Making matters worse, the Appellate Court recently invalidated a large portion of the revised third round COAH rules that gave the Township a variety bonus credits for past performance and for allowing the creation of affordable rental housing. Without these extra credits and other mechanisms thrown out by the Court, the Township’s affordable housing obligation could grow significantly higher than it already is. Fortunately, the Township sought and secured a stay from both COAH and the Supreme Court of the Appellate Court’s ruling on this matter. Now, the Supreme Court will decide the ultimate merits of this issue, but the outcome is far from certain, which is why the Township has actively been seeking legislative action that has not been forthcoming. The legislation that has been proposed so far, in most cases would be a giant step backwards, making matters far worse. Fortunately the Governor vetoed the bill that was actually passed by the legislature since it would have increased the Township’s affordable housing obligation possibly two-fold.

As a result, the Township has been forced to zone a number of properties in a way that it would not have otherwise, only to satisfy COAH’s requirements. It is also critical in order to stem what are known as Builder’s Remedy lawsuits, which essentially strip away any local control and allows the courts to order the approval of housing developments. In fact, the Township is currently subject to a challenge by the owners of the Bamm Hollow Country Club. Specifically, since challenging our plans, they have been seeking to construct 1,200 multi-family dwellings that would include at least 240 COAH units upon their 277-acre property. They also have an application pending for 50 homes which the property is currently zoned for, which is also not actively being pursued. That application will not make this litigation go away as they are continuing to seek a development many times that size. We are currently seeking a stay before the Appellate Court in this matter in an effort to try to resolve it through sound planning without facing the prospect of 1,200 more units of housing in Lincroft. The reality of the situation is that if the Avaya property had not been zoned to allow for the development of residential housing two years ago, Bamm Hollow would likely be building 1,200 court-ordered units on its property by now.

These are the unfortunate realities currently faced by the Township until the Legislature or the Courts act appropriately to eliminate these irrational mandates that do nothing but promote poor planning and development while wasting hundreds of thousands of taxpayer dollars. I would note, however, that the Avaya property is still also zoned to allow for commercial development, so the Township is not impeding that from taking place should market conditions allow for it. Further, the Township has been encouraging businesses to move into the site along with seeking economic development assistance for prospective tenants from the state.

Simply put, due to legislative inaction, the Township was left with no option but to include Avaya property as part of its housing plan three years ago to allow for residential development. The reality is that the alternative would be far worse for Lincroft and the Township as a whole. We would like to encourage all residents, as many of you have in the past, to write and call Senate President Steve Sweeney and Assembly Speaker Sheila Oliver who should be held accountable along with the entire State Legislature for failing to act on the Governor’s proposed COAH reforms. With those reforms, there is at least a chance that this project may not have advanced to this point.

Sincerely,
Anthony P. Mercantante, P.P. AICP
Township Administrator

8 Comments

Filed under Avaya, Bam Hollow, COAH, Gov. Chris Christie, Lincroft NJ, lincroft village green association, LVGA, Middletown Township Committee, Sonic, Tony Mercantante, Torsevia, Towns Center, Trenton

8 responses to “>Middletown Update and Background Proposed Four Ponds Development Plan

  1. >Can you prove the Township went to the owners as you claim? That's an outright lie and you know it. If the town did do that, why didn't Short or Byrnes say anything about it? Weren't they BOTH representing the Township on the Committee in 2009?

  2. >It is not an outright lie, according to a number of Lincroft residents who sat through a LVGA presentation with Tony Mercantante and Jason Greenspan.I have been told that "the Township did say (more than once) that they had approached several owners of various properties, which the Township identified by name and location. They also stated that this was the only owner that was ready willing and able to proceed and move forward."So whose lying here?As for Short and Byrnes, being in the minority has disadvantages. They were never consulted on any of this and only found out after the fact that the property was going to be rezoned. So there wasn't much that could be done about it. And before you turn this into a "who voted for what" issue, it is true that Short and Byrnes approved of the rezoning, but only to keep Middletown out of taxpayers out of court.

  3. >"…but only in order to keep Middletown (and ) … the taxpayers out of court."Seems like that's exactly what Mr. Mercantante said, right? That the COAH laws forced the Township to have approved plans that provided for the required amounts of COAH units?So, are you saying that you'd rather have the 1200 Bamm Hollow units instead of 342 Avaya units?

  4. >"…but only in order to keep Middletown (and ) … the taxpayers out of court."Seems like that's exactly what Mr. Mercantante said, right? That the COAH laws forced the Township to have approved plans that provided for the required amounts of COAH units?So, are you saying that you'd rather have the 1200 Bamm Hollow units instead of 342 Avaya units?

  5. >anon 6:56,No, I'm not saying I would rather have 1200 units at Bam Hollow.And no, what Short and Byrnes said was not the same as what Mercantante said for a simple reason. Middletown went to the owners of the Avaya property and suggested the rezoning to them and then lied about it to residents.I believe this was done so that the Township could head off Bam Hollow, which orginally wasn't going to be a 1200 unit development when first proposed.The Township was giving the developers of Bam Hollow such a hard time that the developer took Middletown to court and won a "builder's remedy" decision against Middletown. That is when the 1200 unit proposal came into play. 1200 units were never going to be and will never be built at Bam Hollow. If my memory serves me correctly 200 non-COAH units are now scheduled to be built on Bam Hollow now.

  6. >The administrator sounds like Scharfy's mouthpiece via CC to attack the legislature. My taxes have not gone down, rather up almost 14% last year, going up again this year. Fewer teachers, larger class sizes, money taken from the sewer authority and library which is a hidden property tax. But every should be comforted by the money pit masquerading as an arts center.Twp. spent piles of money fighting the town center which they originally proposed to the property owner. Would have been a great tax ratable, created jobs, helped to alleviate coah obligations. But no they fought against the idea they brought forth. The only thing these people are interested in is getting re-elected.

  7. >AND NOT ONE OF THEM DESERVES TO RE_ELECTED……NOT ONE!!AND SCHARFENBERGER SHOULD BE RECALLED.

  8. >Middletown botched this from the start. First, with not trading our COAH obligation with Red Bank.Then with Bamm Hollow and then having to rezone the Avaya site so they wouldn't get sued.You can put the proposed town center in there too.Now it's back peddling, distortion and deception. The TC has never been honest about this in the first place.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s